0.05/0.10	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 960
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:47:59 EDT 2022
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.41	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.15/0.41	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.15/0.41	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting full_lambda_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# post_as_ho11 with pid 26489 completed with status 0
0.15/0.42	# Result found by post_as_ho11
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.42	# Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# new_ho_10 with pid 26493 completed with status 0
0.15/0.42	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.42	# Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.15/0.42	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# Proof found!
0.15/0.42	# SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.42	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_22, type, in: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_23, type, is_a: $i > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_24, type, emptyset: $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_25, type, unord_pair: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_26, type, singleton: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_27, type, union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_28, type, excl_union: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_29, type, intersection: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_30, type, setminus: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_31, type, complement: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_32, type, disjoint: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_33, type, subset: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_34, type, meets: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_35, type, misses: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_36, type, cartesian_product: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_37, type, pair_rel: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_38, type, id_rel: ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_39, type, sub_rel: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_40, type, is_rel_on: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_41, type, restrict_rel_domain: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_42, type, rel_diagonal: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_43, type, rel_composition: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_44, type, reflexive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_45, type, irreflexive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_46, type, symmetric: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_47, type, transitive: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_48, type, equiv_rel: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_49, type, rel_codomain: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_50, type, rel_domain: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_51, type, rel_inverse: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_52, type, equiv_classes: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_53, type, restrict_rel_codomain: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_54, type, rel_field: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_55, type, well_founded: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_56, type, upwards_well_founded: ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_57, type, a: $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_58, type, epred1_0: $i > $i > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_59, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_60, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.15/0.42	thf(subset, axiom, ((subset)=(^[X16:$i > $o, X17:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((X16 @ X4)=>(X17 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^0.ax', subset)).
0.15/0.42	thf(cartesian_product, axiom, ((cartesian_product)=(^[X22:$i > $o, X23:$i > $o, X4:$i, X24:$i]:(((X22 @ X4)&(X23 @ X24))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^2.ax', cartesian_product)).
0.15/0.42	thf(sub_rel, axiom, ((sub_rel)=(^[X26:$i > $i > $o, X27:$i > $i > $o]:(![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((X26 @ X1 @ X3)=>(X27 @ X1 @ X3)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^2.ax', sub_rel)).
0.15/0.42	thf(rel_domain, axiom, ((rel_domain)=(^[X28:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:((X28 @ X1 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET008^2.ax', rel_domain)).
0.15/0.42	thf(thm, conjecture, ![X28:$i > $i > $o]:(((sub_rel @ X28 @ (cartesian_product @ a @ (^[X1:$i]:(($true)))))<=(subset @ (rel_domain @ X28) @ a))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', thm)).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_5, plain, ((subset)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o]:(![X4:$i]:(((Z0 @ X4)=>(Z1 @ X4)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subset])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((cartesian_product)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i, Z3:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)&(Z1 @ Z3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cartesian_product])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((sub_rel)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $i > $o]:(![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((Z0 @ X1 @ X3)=>(Z1 @ X1 @ X3)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[sub_rel])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((rel_domain)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:((Z0 @ Z1 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rel_domain])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(![X28:$i > $i > $o]:((![X48:$i]:((?[X47:$i]:((X28 @ X48 @ X47))=>(a @ X48)))=>![X45:$i, X46:$i]:(((X28 @ X45 @ X46)=>(a @ X45)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm])]), c_0_5]), c_0_6]), c_0_7]), c_0_8])])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X50:$i, X51:$i]:(((~(epred1_0 @ X50 @ X51)|(a @ X50))&((epred1_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)&~(a @ esk1_0)))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((a @ X1)|~((epred1_0 @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~((a @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.42	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.42	# Parsed axioms                        : 72
0.15/0.42	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.15/0.42	# Initial clauses                      : 39
0.15/0.42	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 36
0.15/0.42	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
0.15/0.42	# Processed clauses                    : 6
0.15/0.42	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.42	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.15/0.42	# ...remaining for further processing  : 6
0.15/0.42	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.15/0.42	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.42	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.15/0.42	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/0.42	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.15/0.42	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.15/0.42	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.42	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/0.42	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.15/0.42	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.42	# NegExts                              : 0
0.15/0.42	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.15/0.42	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.42	# Current number of processed clauses  : 3
0.15/0.42	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.15/0.42	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.42	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.15/0.42	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.15/0.42	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.15/0.42	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.15/0.42	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.42	# Current number of archived clauses   : 3
0.15/0.42	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.15/0.42	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.42	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.15/0.42	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.42	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.42	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/0.42	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/0.42	# Condensation attempts                : 6
0.15/0.42	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.42	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1860
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.42	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.15/0.42	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.15/0.42	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.15/0.42	# Maximum resident set size: 1924 pages
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.42	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.15/0.42	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.15/0.42	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.15/0.42	# Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
0.15/0.42	EOF